CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ORDINANCE, NO. 9 OF 1899.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
11
Arraignment and trial of insane person.
74.-(1) If an accused person appears, either before
or on arraignment, to be insane, the court may order a
jury to be empanelled to try the sanity of such person,
and the jury shall thereupon, after hearing evidence for
that purpose, find whe ther such person is or is not insane
and unfit to take his trial.
(2) If, during the trial of an accused person, such
person appears, after the hearing of evidence to that
effect or otherwise, to the jury charged with the
indictment to be insane, the court shall in such case direct
the jury to abstain from finding a verdict upon the
indictment and, in lieu thereof, to return a verdict that
such person is insane: Provided that a verdict under this
section shall not affect the trial of any person so found
to be insane for the offence for which he was indicted
in case he subsequently becomes of sound mind.
75. Where in an indictment any act or omission is
charged against any person as an offence, and it is given
in evidence on the trial of such person for that offence
that he was insane, so as not to be responsible, according
to law, for his actions at the time when the act was done
or the omission made, then, if it appears to the jury before
whom such person is tried that he did the act or made the
omission charged, but was insane as aforesaid at the time
when he did or made the same, the jury shall return a special
verdict to the effect that the accused person was guilty
of the act or omission charged against him, but was insane
as aforesaid at the time when he did or made the same.
76.-(1) When any person is found to be insane under
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.